Bravo, Governor Bailey!
Is Powell Watching?
During a week when financial markets were dominated by developments in the United Kingdom, Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey was the unsung hero for his efforts to restore independence to the central bank. Despite the continuing massive losses to British pension funds from the surge in long-dated gilt yields, Bailey announced on Tuesday that the BoE would not continue its emergency bond buying program beyond October 14.
Investors’ reaction can be summarized by “How can he do this now? Will that not lead to further sales of gilts, and take the pound sterling to a new low?” Yes, the Bailey announcement would have done that, but only if the misguided fiscal measures that Prime Minister Liz Truss and Chancellor of the Exchequer Kwasi Kwarteng introduced on September 23 were not reversed. Implicitly, the new “mini budget” increased the unfunded deficit by at least £45 billion, and left it to the BoE to clean up the adverse fallout on financial markets from the measures.
Bailey and his colleagues at the central bank did initially give in to the Treasury moves. Quantitative Tightening by the BoE — sale of bonds to reduce liquidity — was promptly replaced by Quantitative Easing to bring down bond yields after the turmoil in London markets began. The casualty was the BoE’s anti-inflation program at a time when consumer prices in July had risen by over 10% during the prior year. But since the bond purchases only made investors clamor for more, Bailey had to decide whether his institution would be permanently subordinated to the Treasury’s whims, or whether he had to chart his own course.
And the new course he chose is what brings kudos to the Governor. His decision to no longer support the fiscal stimulus program through emergency purchases of gilts is bringing fiscal rectitude to the British administration. At the same time, the Bailey decision emphasizes the independence of monetary policy — historically, a key factor that has been shown to keep inflation under control in various countries around the world.
With the BoE unwilling to pick up the pieces after them, the Prime Minister and her Chancellor canceled the tax cut at the highest income level, and dropped plans not to raise a corporation tax by £18 billion. Kwarteng was fired as Chancellor yesterday. Despite the initial positive market reaction to the partial U-turn on policy and the Chancellor’s dismissal, investors decided that the measures were insufficient. Yields on 10-year gilts and 5-year gilts rose by 18 basis points and 27 basis points respectively yesterday, reversing rallies earlier in the day.
The Prime Minister chose Jeremy Hunt, who lost out to her in the race to lead the government in an early round, and even though Hunt had ended up supporting the candidacy of her arch rival, Rishi Sunak. The new Chancellor will have to institute further cuts in spending, and raise taxes, in a hurry. Otherwise, markets will be no kinder to him than they were to Kwarteng. Hunt will have a free hand to institute market-friendly measures. In light of her unpopularity, Truss cannot fire him without at the same time bringing her own government down!
Bailey’s non-intervention announcement of Tuesday was made when he was in Washington, DC to attend the IMF - World Bank meetings. Was another central banker based in that city, Jerome Powell, listening? The Federal Reserve’s pursuit of zero interest rates and $120 billion of monthly bond purchases last year occurred despite a $1.9 trillion fiscal program introduced by the incoming Biden administration to follow $900 billion in new stimulus in the closing months of the Trump administration. The Chairman decided that any inflation would be “transitory” despite the immensity of the fiscal stimulus that had accompanied his monetary expansion.
Although the Chairman claimed that the persistence of high inflation was “unexpected” — he has never explicitly acknowledged the huge error in his forecast — it had been clear to some of us that the combination of expansionary policy from the Treasury and the Federal Reserve would end with the elevated inflation rates that we are witnessing.
We learned Thursday that the Fed’s error was costly. Despite three successive 75bp increases in the Federal Funds rate in June, July and September, the core consumer prices (which exclude food and energy) rose by 6.6% over the past year, the highest in 40 years. While that assures another 75bp increase at the next meeting of the Federal Open Markets Committee due to take place on November 1 and 2, the question is: What happens after that?
As the recession starts to bite during the coming year even as US inflation stays well above the central bank’s 2% target, it would be instructive to watch whether the Federal Reserve Chairman will resist political pressures to stimulate beyond levels appropriate to get to the 2% inflation rate. Campaigning for the 2024 presidential elections will become active from next year onward, and Powell will face pressure to go easy.
I shall leave it to you to guess how I would bet.
Dr. Komal Sri-Kumar
President
Sri-Kumar Global Strategies, Inc.
Santa Monica, California
srikumar@srikumarglobal.com
@SriKGlobal
October 15, 2022
Sri-Kumar Global Strategies, Inc. advises multinational investors and sovereign wealth funds on global risk and opportunities. Dr. Sri-Kumar is regularly featured on business TV and Radio media, and is a frequent speaker in global financial centers on major topics that affect markets and investments.
This publication is for information purposes only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. While the information and statistical data contained herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, we do not represent that it is accurate and should not be relied on as such or be the basis for an investment decision. Any opinions expressed are current only as of the time made and are subject to change without notice. Sri-Kumar Global Strategies, Inc. assumes no duty to update any such statements. Any holdings of a particular company or security discussed herein are under periodic review by the author and are subject to change at any time, without notice. This report may include estimates, projections and other "forward-looking statements." Due to numerous factors, actual events may differ substantially from those presented. This publication is not to be used or considered as an offer to sell, or a solicitation to an offer to buy, any security. Nothing contained herein should be considered a recommendation or advice to purchase or sell any security. Sri-Kumar Global Strategies, Inc., or its employees or clients may have positions in securities or investments mentioned in this publication, which positions may change at any time without notice. ©Copyright 2022 -- Sri-Kumar Global Strategies, Inc., 312 Arizona Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90401; Telephone: +1-310-455-6071

Sorry but I don’t think the market reaction in the gilt and GBP market is rationale. If so, what should it be of Treasuries, JGBs, BTPs, OATs whose issuer have fundamentals surely not better than the U.K. it looks to me that the political will is drifting towards bigger state presence so tax cuts are not welcome at all especially if they had to be associated with spending cuts. The Truss mistake has been the subsidy package for energy bills (a non sense in a country where the energy bill is capped at 2500 GBP per year!). As far as the FED is concerned they will resist until the TSY market will crack. Central bankers are to be blamed for allowing politicians to drag them into MMT madness...because accordingly to the magical theory now we should see a tighter fiscal policy to curb demand....